🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," stated one European lawmaker driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to national gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws mandating guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various politicians to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, additional states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more measured stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

Even as this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that governments around the world are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.